Thursday, May 3, 2018

Relocating In Retirement: Don't Make These Common Mistakes





Relocating In Retirement: Don't Make These Common Mistakes

Jamie Hopkins CONTRIBUTOR Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own.


While most Americans show a desire to age in place, retirement can also be the ideal time to sell your home and relocate or downsize. Kids are typically grown up and moved out of the home, and the need to be close to work is gone, so many seniors use retirement as a catalyst for relocating. Some relocate because of a lifestyle or climate change, others want to be to family, and others due purely to financial circumstances. Whatever the reason, retirees appear to be making two big mistakes with their homes. They seem to vastly misunderstand the home as an investment decision, and they don’t consider the financing options available to them at all.

In the 2017 National Association of REALTORS® Home Buyer and Seller Generational Trends Report, homebuyers were asked to compare the purchase of their home as a financial investment as compared to a stock. Amazingly, 80% of those ages 61-70 viewed it as a good financial investment, with over half stating it was a better investment than stocks. Now, while stocks are more volatile, they do appear to be a far better investment option than a single family home. Generally speaking, homes keep pace with inflation and provide no real returns over time. Additionally, many senior-owned homes tend to decrease in real value terms over time due to a lack of updates and upkeep to the home. In 2017 the Dow posted a 25% return, while home values have surged over the past year, only netting out a roughly 6% return over the same time period. While 6% would normally be great, it pales in comparison to stock returns over the past year.

This does not mean that purchasing a home is a bad decision. You need a place to live, and buying a home is often a better financial decision than renting. The reality is that homes are not good investments, but they can still be a good financial decision. Nevertheless, the fact remains that stocks have proved historically to be a good investment in the long run, while homes stay flat when adjusted for inflation.

When relocating in retirement, a new home purchase must be financed or funded in some way. There are a lot of options for doing this; however, few seniors appear to be reviewing the entire range of financing options. According to the same 2017 NAR® Generational study, roughly 68% of home buyers aged 61-70 financed their home, with a median percent of their home financed at 81%. Additionally, 89% of these individuals used a conventional mortgage. Another 4% used a fixed then adjustable rate, 2% used an adjustable rate, 4% didn’t know what type of mortgage they used and 2% responded other.

In the end, the majority of seniors relocating are doing one of two things, mostly financing their home purchase through a traditional mortgage or buying the new home outright. Unfortunately, both of these options come with some serious drawbacks. Taking out a new mortgage to almost fully finance the home purchase in retirement creates some serious cash flow and repayment issues. Additionally, those purchasing a home outright with cash are essentially investing and locking up a lot of their wealth into one asset that does not provide great returns over time.

Instead, more seniors should consider putting some money down and financing a portion of the home with a HECM for Purchase, which is a variation of a reverse mortgage. This can mitigate problems on both sides by eliminating the requirement to make monthly mortgage payments and freeing up cash for other uses. Additionally, with less than 1 percent of seniors using a reverse mortgage, and even fewer using it to purchase a home through the HECM for purchase program, more seniors need to understand the program and its benefits. Reverse mortgages were designed by the Government to allow senior homeowners to tap into their home equity to support their retirement. A number of years ago HUD revamped the program to also allow homeowners 62+ to buy a home with a variation of the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage, commonly referred to as a reverse mortgage. While the more common reverse mortgage allows homeowners to leverage a portion of the equity in their home, the HECM for Purchase is designed for those 62+ to purchase a home by putting forth about half of the cost of purchase price and financing the other half with the HECM for Purchase.  This allows the homeowner to not have to fully fund the purchase through a conventional mortgage or pay all cash up-front.

Chris Kargacos, SVP of Sales at Retirement Funding Solutions, a leading lender of the HECM for Purchase, stated “this program can be a good option for senior buyers who are looking to right size their housing needs and potentially bolster their retirement portfolio or improve their cash flow position. While this may not be a fit for everyone, it can be a viable option for some.” While the HECM for Purchase does not make sense for everyone, it makes sense for a lot more buyers than are currently using the program. (For more information on the HECM for Purchase check out this guideprovided by the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association or check out this short video).

When it comes to retirement and your home, look at the options out there and understand how each decision impacts your entire retirement plan. Taking on debt through a conventional mortgage or a reverse mortgage can be a viable strategy to facilitate a home purchase in retirement, but understand the impact and costs associated with the transaction. Don’t view the home as an investment strategy but instead as purchasing a place to live that will support your desired lifestyle goals in retirement. Where to live is one of the most important decisions you will make in retirement, so take the time to review your options and understand the implications of financing your new retirement home.

Sponsor of the Tucson SPOTLIGHT Senior Services & Living Options Resource Guide



Contact us today and say, "I saw you in SPOTLIGHT!"
Visit us online @ www.novareverse.com 




Monday, April 23, 2018

Many Americans Try Retirement, Then Change Their Minds




Last week, an Uber driver told me he joined the gig economy less than a year after he retired from his job at DC Metro. He didn’t need the money, but he did want a way to keep his mind occupied. Now he does mostly local drives around the city, but it’s enough to stay alert and busy. And, he’s getting ready to join a gym so his body is as healthy as his mind.
He’s not alone in his quest to keep working after retirement. An article from Paula Span reprinted by Aging Edge, “Many Americans Try Retirement, Then Change Their Minds,” explores another side of the golden years of relaxation – some people find it too relaxing.
Why go back to work? We hear endless warnings about Americans having failed to save enough, and the need for income does motivate some returning workers.
But Ms. Maestas, using longitudinal data from the national Health and Retirement Study, has found that the decision to resume working doesn’t usually stem from unexpected financial problems or health expenses.
“It looks like something people are doing intentionally, instead of an oh-my-God response: ‘I’m running out of money; I have to go back to work,’” she said. “It’s much more about a choice.”
Longer lives, better health and less physically taxing jobs than in previous generations help provide that choice, Ms. Maestas pointed out.
“You hear certain themes: A sense of purpose. Using your brain,” she said. “And another key component is social engagement.” Earning money, while welcomed, rarely proved the primary incentive.
Visit us online today to learn about Reverse Mortgages @ www.novareverse.com

Thursday, April 19, 2018

How To Figure Out Elder Care For Your Aging Parent




For T.J. Mancuso, 40, of Apex, N.C., the health of his parents took center stage five years ago when a medical condition left his father unable to qualify for long-term care insurance. Seeing his mother deal with the challenges of being a full-time caregiver, Mancuso decided that it was time for the family to come up with a better plan.
“Knowing that we couldn't do anything for my dad, I was like, ‘let's do something for mom,’ " Mancuso says. So he and his wife Erica purchased a long-term care policy for his mother. “I'd rather spend money on a monthly premium today,” Mancuso says. “Maybe she'll never need it, but I know what I'm spending monthly today is probably what a day or two of help would be down the road.”
Like the Mancusos, many Americans are grappling with the financial realities of caring for an elderly parent. In 2017, the national median cost of a semiprivate room in a nursing home was $7,148 per month and assisted living facilities averaged $3,750, according to the Genworth Cost of Care Survey. With costs so prohibitive, many families feel they have no other option but to take care of mom and dad at home. Ideally, families will figure out how to cover the costs of aging long before the money is needed. 
Here are some strategies that can help: 

Talk things out 

“Everything begins with communication,” says Christopher Krell, a principal with Cassaday & Co., a wealth management firm in McLean, Va. Krell suggests holding what he calls a family wealth summit, where adult children find out what financial resources aging parents have in place for future health care and other challenges.
Also “make sure you have a medical and a financial power of attorney in place,” says Patrick Simasko, an elder law attorney and wealth preservation specialist at Simasko Law in Mount Clemens, Mich. If aging parents have enough assets in place to cover future health care costs, adult children can learn through the conversation how to access them down the road, but if not, it’s time to turn to Plan B.

Look to insurance 

Traditional long-term care insurance policies are designed to pay for costs that occur when you no longer can handle certain activities of daily living such as bathing, dressing or moving around. Money can be used for nursing home care, assisted living or in-home care. There also are hybrid long-term care/life insurance policies, where the policy-holder can tap into the death benefit early to pay for long-term care if they need it. If they don’t, the money would go to the beneficiary upon the policyholder’s death as planned.
“If you don't wind up needing nursing home care, your premiums are still giving benefit to your family,” says Marcy Keckler, vice president of Financial Advice Strategy at Minneapolis-based Ameriprise Financial. While an Ameriprise study released in March found that future health problems topped most respondents’ lists of financial fears, only 25% had long-term care insurance in place.
The older the policyholder, the more expensive the policy. Also, those with physical ailments may not qualify, so you should apply when you are healthy.  If the elderly parents can’t afford it, adult children can pool their money together and pay those costs since it may be less expensive than paying for care later on, Keckler adds.

Look into public programs

 If long-term care insurance isn’t an option and your family doesn’t have the financial resources to care for an elderly relative, you may need to look to government services to pick up the slack.  Contrary to popular belief, Medicare does not pay for long-term nursing home care. Medicaid, however, will pay for long-term care — if the elderly person has limited income and assets. There also are benefits available to veterans through the Veterans Administration, Simasko says. 

Consider family caregivers’ needs 

Approximately 16%  of Americans 15 and over provided unpaid care to someone 65 or older in 2016, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.  Caregivers may even be forced to leave their own jobs to provide assistance full time, which could jeopardize their own retirements, says Sean Scaturro, advice director for the Life and Health Division of USAA, based in San Antonio. “This trickle-down effect of being an unpaid caregiver actually is going to be seen in the next generation and potentially the generation after that,” Scaturro says.
A financial adviser can help you rearrange your budget to deal with the new reality as well as help you identify resources that can help, says Delynn Dolan Alexander,  a wealth management adviser for Northwestern Mutual in Durham, N.C. “Having a good financial plan will give you the confidence to be able to care for your parents and know that you're going to be OK," she says.
Sponsor of the Tucson SPOTLIGHT Senior Services & Living Options Guide
Contact us today and say, "I saw you in SPOTLIGHT"
Visit us online @ www.NovaReverse.com 

Monday, April 9, 2018

Few Retired People Expect to Pay Off Their Mortgages


Burning the mortgage deed in celebration of owning your home free and clear, once a ritual for most older Americans on their way to retirement, has become less common.

A recent "Retirement and Mortgages" survey by American Financing, a national mortgage banker, found 44 percent of Americans age 60 to 70 have a mortgage when they retire, with as many as 17 percent saying they may never pay it off.

The survey found 32 percent predict they will be paying their mortgage for at least eight more years and 11 percent say it will take six to eight years before their last loan payment.

Another 14 percent say it will take three to five years to reach the payoff, and 7 percent say it will take one to two more years. Twenty percent of those who retire with a mortgage will pay it in full within one year.

The survey found a majority (64 percent) of 60- to 70-year-olds plan to remain in their home and 62 percent plan to leave their home to their children. The majority (71 percent) would rather make home renovations rather than move if a health issue affected their mobility or comfort at home. However, about half (48 percent) are unsure of what they will do if retirement funds run low.

Retirees and pre-retirees can look into refinancing or a reverse mortgage as potential solutions to reduce or eliminate mortgage debt.

A financial adviser can help evaluate those and other options. American Financing's survey found 19 percent of those surveyed don't know what a reverse mortgage is, while 15 percent would be open to considering one.

Sponsored by the Tucson SPOTLIGHT Senior Services &
Living Options Resource Guide


Contact us today and say "I found you in SPOTLIGHT!"
Learn more about reverse mortgages by visit us today @ www.novareverse.com 



Wednesday, March 21, 2018

Best Cities for Retirement


 50 Places in the US where retirement is affordable, healthcare is excellent and life is good!



  • Retirement is something to think about years before you get there.
  • Choosing the best place to retire in the US means weighing affordability, quality of life, activities, and healthcare.
  • WalletHub ranked the best US cities to live in retirement.
  • Many of the top cities are in states with warm weather, such as Florida and Arizona.

Deciding where to live in retirement may be one of the last major financial decisions you'll make, and picking the right spot is important.
WalletHub set out to put worried minds at ease. The site used available data for the 150 largest US cities to find the best and worst places to lay your hat. We already looked at the worst cities for retirement, so let's take a look at the opposite: the best urban areas to live in your post-working life.
How people spend time when they don't have to go to the office every day tends to be a little different. Many dream of hours full of painting and golf, but there are more practical considerations to keep in mind too.
Along with the weather and nearby museums and tennis courts, reliable, accessible healthcare and affordable housing are important benchmarks when determining where to live in retirement.
WalletHub found that the cities below offered a great quality of life, good healthcare, and plentiful activities — all at an affordable cost.
WalletHub scored each city based on affordability, activities, quality of life, and healthcare. The four categories were weighted equally, and each city was given a total score and then ranked, with the highest overall score designating the best city. WalletHub used data for only the city, not the surrounding metro area.
Florida is considered one of the best states for retirement, so it is no surprise that several Sunshine State cities — including the top three — found their way onto this list.
Other warm-weather locations are also well represented on the list; the five cities with the highest percentage of senior citizens are in Arizona, Florida, and Hawaii.
Keep reading to see the best places to retire in the US, according to WalletHub. We've included the total score for each city (out of a possible 100), with a higher score denoting a better place to live, as well as its ranking out of 150 cities for each of the four categories, with a lower number being better.
50. Chandler, Arizona
49. Washington, D.C.
48. Nashville, Tennessee
47. Columbus, Ohio
46. Charlotte, North Carolina
45. Lincoln, Nebraska
44. Virginia Beach, Virginia
43. Phoenix, Arizona
42. Birmingham, Alabama
41. Henderson, Nevada
40. Dallas, Texas
39. Portland, Oregon
38. San Antonio, Texas
37. San Diego, California
36. Pembroke Pines, Florida
35. Tallahassee, Florida
34. Overland Park, Kansas
33. Tempe, Arizona
32. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
31. Baton Rouge, Louisiana
30. St. Louis, Missouri
29. Reno, Nevada
28. Seattle, Washington
27. Richmond, Virginia
26. Tucson, Arizona
25. Colorado Springs, Colorado
24. Boise, Idaho
23. Los Angeles, California
22. Sioux Falls, South Dakota
21. San Francisco, California
20. Cincinnati, Ohio
19. Raleigh, North Carolina
18. Port St. Lucie, Florida
17. St. Petersburg, Florida
16. Madison, Wisconsin
15. Fort Lauderdale, Florida
14. Minneapolis, Minnesota
13. Cape Coral, Florida
12. New Orleans, Louisiana
11. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
10. Las Vegas, Nevada
9.  Austin, Texas
8.  Denver, Colorado
7.  Honolulu, Hawaii
6.  Salt Lake City, Utah
5.  Atlanta, Georgia
4.  Scottsdale, Arizona
3.  Miami, Florida
2.  Tampa, Florida
1.  Orlando, Florida



Sponsor of the Tucson SPOTLIGHT Senior Services
& Living Options Guide



Contact us today and say "I saw you in SPOTLIGHT!"
Visit us online @ www.novareverse.com 







Monday, March 19, 2018

Should You Help Your Child With A Down Payment For A House?



SHOULD YOU HELP YOUR ADULT CHILD WITH A DOWN PAYMENT FOR A HOUSE?

Here are a list of guidelines you can follow.
More than one-third of Millennials looking to purchase their first home say they plan to rely on a loan or a gift from a relative to cover a key portion of their down payment, according to a recent survey.
And even if your own kids haven't yet asked for a hand, many of them might be considering it. The "Modern Homebuyer" survey from ValueInsured, a company that sells insurance to consumers that pays back their down payments if the value of their home falls, indicates that nearly 60% of Millennials looking to buy their first home aren't confident they can afford to do so.

So if your adult children could use some help buying their new digs, should you reach into your savings — retirement or otherwise — to help them out? The answer, as usual, when it comes to issues of personal finance — is, well, personal. But here are some guidelines you can follow:

When It’s a Bad Idea...

If you are a middle-income earner. “A middle income earner, despite their best intentions, should not support their child’s purchase of a home if it means sacrificing contributions to their retirement,” says Jacob I. Milder, CFP, at Oak Street Investments in Denver. If opportunities still exist to contribute to a 401(k), 403(b), or IRA, loaning money would mean decrease these contributions, he says.

If you have to use your nest egg. Interest rates on 401(k) loans can be very appealing, but some experts say not so fast. “Many 401(k) plans will not let you continue to contribute money until you have repaid the full amount borrowed,” says debt resolution attorney Leslie Tayne.

If you are nearing retirement. “Parents who invest their money instead of giving it to the children could potentially leverage another 10 to 15 years of compounding interest and market returns,” says James Nichols, Head of Advice and Retirement Income Strategy for Voya Financial Retirement Solutions in Windsor, Connecticut.

When It’s a Good Idea...

If it’s a good investment. If you plan to lend the money instead of gifting it, you may reap some financial benefits. “Many of my clients feel that bonds will likely return very little if any returns for the next decade,” says T. Eric Reich, CFP and President of Reich Asset Management in Marmora, N.J. “You can lend money at a cheaper rate than banks and possibly get a greater return than you could expect in a fixed-income portfolio for the foreseeable future.”

If your child has a steady source of income. Make sure your child can afford all of the responsibilities of owning a home. “For instance, if your child has just completed graduate school or is already employed in a position that has a strong earnings trajectory, then consider a loan with an agreed upon timetable for repayment,” says Milder.

John Reinmuth, 74, a retired pastor from Gig Harbor, Washington, and his late wife Jan, a former elementary school teacher who died in 2013, decided to help their son who works in theater set construction and their daughter-in-law who works in a college admissions office with a the purchase of a house. The Reinmuths matched what the young couple could accumulate with a gift of $8,000, helping them to buy a starter home with a 10% down payment.

And In 2011, the Reinmuths gave a daughter and son-in-law $12.000 toward a down payment. Added to their savings, the couple made a 20% down payment, eliminating the need for private mortgage insurance and got a better interest rate, Reinmuth says.

“Working with a certified financial professional, we learned that our pensions, Social Security, and IRAs provided a 98% likelihood that our retirement resources would not run out before we died,” Reinmuth says. “Thus, we felt comfortable helping our son and daughter-in-law to purchase a house."

Wednesday, March 7, 2018

Will You Outlive Your Retirement Savings?


Your nest egg needs to sustain you throughout retirement.  Here's how to make sure it does! 

Of the various things today's older workers might fear — losing their jobs, needing to quit due to health issues, and so forth — there's perhaps no prospect more terrifying than the notion of outliving their savings. In fact, 60% of Baby Boomers claim they're more worried about running out of money in retirement than actually dying.
Sadly, it's a valid concern, especially since countless older Americans are also considerably behind on savings. The Economic Policy Institute reports that the median savings balance among workers ages 56 to 61 is a mere $17,000 — hardly enough to live off even with Social Security factored into the mix.
If you're concerned about outliving your savings, then you'll need to be proactive in avoiding that fate. And there are steps you can take to improve your long-term financial picture. First, however, you'll need to assess your personal risk, which you can do by asking yourself the following questions:  

1. Have I been saving 15% or more of my income?

It used to be the case that to retire comfortably, you'd need to set aside 10% of your earnings over time. Not anymore. Given the way health care and other costs have inflated in recent years, you'll need to do better if you want enough money to cover the bills for the long haul. That's why workers today really need to set aside 15% or more of their income for the future.
If you've been saving at that level, or somewhere in the vicinity, then you're probably in pretty good shape. Similarly, if you haven't been saving that much, but are still relatively young with many working years ahead of you, there's a good chance you'll come out just fine if you ramp up immediately. But if you're already in your mid- to late 50s and haven't been hitting that threshold, there's a strong chance you'll run out of money at some point if you don't take steps to compensate.
How do you do that? It's simple: Work longer, and max out your savings for as many years as you can. If your original goal was to retire at 65 and you push yourself to work until 70, all the while maxing out your 401(k) during that five-year period, you'll have an extra $122,500 to play with in retirement — and that assumes zero investment growth. Not only will extending your career offer you an opportunity to save more, but it'll also help you avoid dipping into your existing savings for however many years you remain on the job.
Another option: Continue working in retirement, albeit on a part-time basis. You can approach your long-term employer about a partial retirement, or pursue something new if you can't bear to keep plugging away at your current job any longer. The key is to generate enough income to avoid depleting your nest egg prematurely.

2. How much of my savings do I plan to withdraw each year?

The key to stretching your nest egg is knowing how much of it you can afford to withdraw annually during retirement. For years, experts have lauded the 4% rule as a solid withdrawal strategy, since the rule is designed to make your savings last for up to 30 years — but unless you fit very specific criteria, withdrawing that much of your savings each year could cause you to deplete your reserves sooner than expected.
The problem with the 4% rule is that it makes certain assumptions about your portfolio and its growth potential. One is that you still have more than half of your assets in stocks, and that your bonds generate a respectable level of income. But what if you unloaded most of your stocks in an effort to lower your risk? Suddenly, that formula is thrown way off. Similarly, bonds today pay considerably less than they did back when the rule was established. So today's retirees need to adjust their withdrawal strategies accordingly.
What should you do? Use the 4% rule as a starting point, but develop a withdrawal plan that better aligns with your circumstances. For example, if you're heavily invested in bonds, and they aren't paying much interest, start out by withdrawing 2% of your nest egg rather than 4%. Being conservative with your withdrawals will help sustain your nest egg, so it's there for you throughout retirement.

3. Am I underestimating my life expectancy?

Many seniors plan for something in the ballpark of a 20-year retirement, but for some folks, that's a dangerously low estimate. That's because one out of every four 65-year-olds today will live past the age of 90, while one in 10 will live past 95. If you're one of them, yet you retire in your mid-60s, you could easily end up in a situation where you run out of money with several years of retirement left ahead of you.
A better bet? Assess your health, and if it's relatively strong, assume the best when it comes to your lifespan. If you operate under the assumption that you'll live until 90 and pass away at 88, you'll have a little something left over to leave to your heirs. And that's a much more ideal scenario than spending down your savings and burdening your family with your bills in your late 80s — assuming you even have that option, which many seniors don't.
If there's one risk you can't afford to take as a senior, it's outliving your savings and scrambling in your old age. So don't put yourself in that situation. Assess your personal risk early on, and take steps to compensate. Otherwise, you could end up falling victim to the fate that's so many retirees' worst nightmare.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
Offer from the Motley Fool: The $16,122 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $16,122 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after.
To learn more about Reverse Mortgages visit us today@ www.novareverse.com